The
Distillation Group, Inc. Home Services Newsletter Contact Distillation Technical Software Training Questions Links Search Navigation

High-Capacity Trays

What is a hanging downcomer tray?

Subject: High-capacity Trays
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2001 16:31:01 +1100

Andrew,

What is a hanging downcomer tray (can you provide a picture)? How does it increase capacity?

L., Asian Refiner

Subject: High-capacity Trays
Date: Thur, 8 Mar 2001 10:32:00 -0600

Overview

High-capacity trays can greatly increase distillation tower capacity. However, they should be used with caution. Many plants have had successes, others have had repeated failures. Often, the difference between success and failure is understanding the performance limits and compromises in advance. Effective application of high-capacity trays requires more precise knowledge of operating conditions and flexibility requirements: greater attention to design detail: and careful installation.

Normal versus High-Capacity Trays

A normal tray, Figure 1, consists of an active area where mass-transfer takes place, a downcomer to move the liquid from tray-to-tray, and an open area where vapor-liquid disengagement takes place and the vapor moves from tray-to-tray. The tray's ability to mix, then separate vapor and liquid limits the tray capacity. A standard tray has an area under the entering downcomer and over the exiting downcomer where liquid and vapor cannot mix on the tray deck. This 'inactive' area is what high-capacity trays attempt to use.

Figure 1
Standard tray

The major type of high-capacity tray that has found wide acceptance are those that convert the area under the downcomer to active area. Figure 2 and Figure 3 show illustrations of a tray with the area under the downcomer converted to active area [1]. Figure 2 is an isometric view of the installed tray and Figure 3 shows a side view including the flow of vapor and liquid.

Figure 2
Hanging downcomer tray
(From US Patent 4,504,426)

Figure 3
Side view of hanging downcomer tray

 

The UOP Multiple Downcomer (MD) tray was the first commercially successful tray with active area under the downcomers [2]. Figure 4 shows an isometric view of a MD tray. The MD-type tray still makes up the majority of high-capacity tray installations. Recently, several variations of trays with increased active [3,4,5,6] area have been aggressively marketed. Increased numbers of tray failures have come along with the aggressive marketing of high-capacity trays [7].

Figure 4
UOP MD tray isometric view

How High-Capacity Trays Work

First, the area under the downcomer must be made into active area, either with perforated holes or directional valves. Second, something must make sure that the downcomer still works. To work, the downcomer needs to be able to pass liquid from a higher tray to a lower tray.

If vapor rises through the downcomer, liquid is prevented from flowing down. The result is a flooded downcomer, flooding the tower in turn. The solutions to keep vapor out of the downcomer are distance, head, direction and momentum. Distance refers to the distances between the tray active area and the downcomer. Head is the height of liquid in the downcomer and the pressure exerted by the liquid. Direction is the direction of movement of the liquid and the vapor. Momentum is the speed of the moving liquid and vapor. A combination of some, or all, of these is used in high-capacity trays to prevent the downcomer from flooding.

The distance required between the bottom edge of the downcomer and the tray deck varies for each variant of the high-capacity tray. However, for any given design, a range of useable distances is possible. Figure 5 shows a tray with too little, correct, and too much clearance between the downcomer and the active area. In Figure 5A the downcomer is too close to the tray deck. The froth from the rising vapor cannot escape sideways. The downcomer outlet area is choked and the tray will flood. In Figure 5C, the distance it too great. Two things can happen here. First, the falling liquid from the downcomer can have enough momentum to go right through the holes in the tray below. Second, the downcomer may be so short that it lacks volume to disengage the froth into vapor and liquid. The downcomer backs up and the tray floods at relatively low liquid rates. In Figure 5B, the downcomer has enough clearance to avoid froth choking but not enough to cause liquid penetration or premature downcomer backup.

Figure 5
Downcomer spacing

Liquid height, or head, exerts a pressure equal to its height times its density. Vapor is prevented from rising up the downcomer by the liquid head. The liquid head in the downcomer is also set by the pressure drop of the liquid leaving the downcomer. The higher the pressure drop, the higher the liquid level in the downcomer.

In a high-capacity tray, the clearance needed to allow vapor to escape from under the downcomer creates a large downcomer opening. The large downcomer opening does not impose sufficient back pressure to hold a liquid level in the downcomer. Figure 6 shows this. Figure 6A is a normal tray with a restricted downcomer clearance. Figure 6B shows an unsealed downcomer with vapor bypassing up the downcomer. Figure 6C shows the solution in place. A restriction in the downcomer creates sufficient pressure drop on the liquid that a head builds up and vapor cannot bypass. Figure 2 shows one design with sieve type holes in a plate placed to seal the downcomer's bottom edge.

Figure 6
Sealed and unsealed downcomers

Direction and momentum can also help to prevent vapor bypassing up the downcomer. In some designs [5,6,8] the vapor rising through the active area under the downcomer is sent through slots angled across the tray instead of through conventional slots. Figure 7 shows the vapor flow direction through a slotted active area under a downcomer. Figure 8 shows a variation that has both the liquid leaving the downcomer and the vapor rising through the active area directed by a slot towards the center of the tray. This direction, coupled with the vapor and liquid velocity, give the mixed vapor-liquid froth on the tray momentum that carries it away from the downcomer inlet.

Figure 7
Vapor flow through slotted area under downcomer

Figure 8
Directional liquid and vapor flow under downcomer

Dynamic Seals and What They Mean

Every variation of high-capacity tray has its own combination of features that are supposed to make the tray work correctly. Nevertheless, one thing that all the commercial high-capacity trays (that convert the downcomer inlet area into active area) have in common is a dynamic seal on the downcomer. This is important. It restricts the flexibility of the tray and makes installation tolerances critical.

What is a dynamic seal? Figure 9 compares a conventional tray with a positive seal, a conventional tray with a dynamic seal, and high-capacity trays with dynamic seals. Figure 9A shows a conventional tray with a positive seal. The bottom edge of the downcomer is below the top edge of the outlet weir. The outlet weir holds a liquid level on the tray and seals the downcomer. At higher liquid rates, the conventional tray may even have its outlet weir chopped off (Figure 9B). This reduces the tray pressure drop (and can increase the tower capacity). However, now the only thing sealing the downcomer is the height of liquid back up in the downcomer. If liquid rates are high, this will work. All high-capacity trays use dynamic seals. Figure 9C shows a high-capacity trays with a dynamic seal.

Figure 9
Static and dynamic seals

Why are dynamic seals important? The only thing preventing vapor bypassing up the downcomer and flooding the tower is the height of liquid in the downcomer. A minimum amount of liquid must be kept in the downcomer to prevent vapor from bypassing through the downcomer. This sets the minimum liquid handling rate of any given tray. Filling the downcomer up with froth and backing liquid onto the tray above sets the maximum liquid rate of the tray. The tray can only operate between these two limits. A conventional tray's downcomer (with a positive seal) does not have the same lower operating liquid rate that a high-capacity tray needs. High-capacity trays have less operating flexibility than conventional trays.

This issue of minimum liquid to seal the downcomer is always a challenge because it conflicts with the priority objective of maximizing downcomer capacity. Vendors tend to err on the side of high capacity. Turndown is almost always less than predicted.

While the dynamic seal places a limit on tray flexibility from one direction, two other factors restrict the liquid flexibility of high-capacity trays from the other direction. First, the effective height of the downcomer on a high-capacity tray is less than that of a standard tray on the same tray spacing. Figure 10 shows this. Second, tray spacing is often changed when using high-capacity trays to increase the number of distillation stages in the same shell. Nearly all high-capacity trays have shorter effective downcomer heights than conventional trays. Downcomer height gives flexibility to handle liquid rate changes. The shorter downcomer height gives less flexibility.

Figure 10
Tray spacing and downcomer flexibility

What happens when the dynamic seal unseals? Two major things can happen. The first is if the downcomer completely unseals. Vapor heads up the downcomer, bypassing the liquid. If the high-capacity tray has a perforated (sieve) active area, liquid now falls through the tray deck. No vapor-liquid mixing occurs. Little fractionation takes place.

Second, if the downcomer partly unseals and the liquid and vapor rates are correct, the entire active area plus the downcomer area can effectively turn into a dual-flow tray (Figure 11). In a dual-flow tray, the vapor rises and the liquid falls through the same hole. A high-capacity tray that unseals and acts like a dual-flow tray will have less capacity than the correctly functioning high-capacity tray. Whether or not dual-tray mode failure occurs depends on the liquid and vapor loads, fluid properties, and tray type and design. Failure modes can switch back and forth between bypassing and dual-flow operation with very small changes in tower loads. This makes troubleshooting high-capacity trays very difficult.

Figure 11
Dual flow failure on high-capacity trays

In addition to the downcomer limitations, high-capacity trays often have very high hole areas on the tray deck. High hole areas pass more vapor. They also restrict vapor handling flexibility. Combining downcomer limits with vapor handling limits, high-capacity trays can have very limited flexibility. As a rule, the higher the capacity through a given tower diameter, the less flexibility is available. In fact, extreme designs approach point operation devices. Point operation devices are trays that will only operate at one specific loading point. They have no turndown capability.

How Much Can High-Capacity Trays Help You?

Over-zealous capacity claims have been made for many types of high-capacity trays. This has lead to several failures of towers to meet expected capabilities. If too much vapor goes up through inlet area devices under the downcomer, tray efficiency may suffer significantly. For a 'conventional' hanging downcomer high-capacity tray, don't expect capacity increase in a revamp to exceed the percent gain in active area. This assumes a one-to-one changeout, with no efficiency effects, change in tray spacing, or change in number of flow passes.

Further Material

Further material on high-capacity trays can be requested from The Distillation Group paper mail server by sending a request to techrequest@distillationgroup.com and noting the following paper numbers (include leading zeros) in the subject line.

077 Should You Switch to High Capacity Trays?; A. Sloley; Chemical Engineering Progress, January, 1999: 23-35.
076 High-Capacity Distillation; A. Sloley; Hydrocarbon Processing, August, 1998: 53-60.
073 High Capacity Trays for Realistic Revamps; A. Sloley; Chemical Engineering Exposition and Conference, Houston, 3-4 June, 1998.
070 High Capacity Trays - Basic Choices; A. Sloley; Distillation Technology Conference, Orlando, April 2-4, 1998.
065 Customized Tower Revamps - Success and Failure; A. Sloley; Fuel Technology and Management, January 1998: 48-50.
040 Why Towers Do Not Work: Part II; A. Sloley, S. Golden, and E. Hartman; National Engineer, Vol. 99, No 9, September 1995: 16-22.
038 Why Towers Do Not Work: Part 1; A. Sloley, S. Golden, and E. Hartman; National Engineer, Vol. 99, No 8, August 1995: 19-34.

References

  1. Chuang, K. T.; Everatt, A. E. Gas liquid contacting apparatus. U.S. Patent 4,504,426, 12 March 1985.
  2. Bruckert, W. Vapor liquid contacting system and method. U.S. Patent 3,410,540, 12 November 1968.
  3. Nye, J. O.; Gangriwala, H. A. Nye trays. Presented at the AIChE Spring National Meeting, 30 March 1992.
  4. Sauter, J. R.; Hauser, R. P.; Harris, J. Fractionation trays. U.S. Patent 5,618,473, 8 April 1997.
  5. Yeoman, N.; Griffith, V. E.; Hsieh, C.-L. Vapor liquid contact tray and downcomer assembly and method of employing same. U.S. Patent 5,480,595, 2 January 1996.
  6. Binkley, M. J.; Thorngren, J. T.; Bonilla, J. A.; Gage, G. W. Downcomer-tray assembly and method. U.S. Patent 4,956,127, 11 September 1990.
  7. Sloley, A. W.; Golden, S. W.; Martin, G. R. Why towers do not work. AIChE Spring National Meeting, 19-23 March 1995, Houston.
  8. Binkley, M. J. Method of and apparatus for flow promotion. U.S. Patent 5,192,466, 9 March 1993.

Andrew Sloley
DGI

Images have been sized for full screen display on an 800x600 monitor.

This page updated 08 March 2001.
© 2001 Andrew W. Sloley. All rights reserved.